Having finished his education, a recent graduate approaches the academy seeking entry so
that he too may speak the law, but a fierce looking guard stands at the door
to the academy and blocks the way inside. The applicant explains nicely that he has completed the requirements and now will speak the law. The guard answers, you cannot speak the law until you have entered and I cannot let you pass. Polite entries, learned dispositions, repeated appeals bring nothing,
the guard is unmoved and will not allow the applicant entry. “But I have trained all my life
to speak the law. All this effort cannot have been for naught. I have a right to speak the law.” These appeals to the guard bring no
satisfaction. The applicant is not
allowed into the academy and so does not speak the law. Driven mad with frustration, the applicant
finds a new solution: to speak his own law. He assumes the mantel of the law
even as he stands outside the first door. A new law he asserts by attacking the excessive privilege of the guard. He has a rich life, has nothing else to fill
his day other than stand before the door.
All his needs are fulfilled, his worries are reduced to the simple task
of guarding the door. This must end, not
only must guards surrender their easy life, they must allow supplicants the
privilege to become guards. Why has he been appointed to stand before the door? Why have I been forced to appeal
for entry? The new law shall be to replace the guard. From now on, I shall stand before the door
to judge the guard. This
shall be my door. But
even at this ruse, the guard answers, “Just because someone stands at the door, that does not make them the law.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment